“Between stimulus and response there’s a area. In that area is our energy to decide on our response.” ~Viktor Frankl
For some time, I forgot about that area.
When battle entered my life—first with my employer, then with my insurance coverage firm—I didn’t react explosively. I didn’t fireplace off reckless emails.
I did one thing that felt way more affordable.
I constructed arguments.
I constructed cautious, layered explanations. I mapped coverage references, contextual particulars, and logical connections. I laid out what felt like an entire reticulum of concepts in my protection. If I may make my case hermetic, I believed, it could be simple.
It appeared rational.
But it surely wasn’t peaceable.
When Battle Enters the Physique
The battle didn’t simply stay in my inbox. It lived in my physique.
I awoke rehearsing arguments. I reread messages after sending them, scanning for weaknesses. I used to be defending myself even in silence.
There was a tightness in my jaw. A low hum of vigilance. A sense of being small inside methods that used language extra formally than I did.
Concern was there, although I didn’t title it at first.
Concern of being misunderstood. Concern of being dismissed. Concern that if I left one hole in my reasoning, it could be used towards me.
So I attempted to depart no gaps.
The Intuition to OverExplain
As somebody skilled to assume in methods, I instinctively search for construction. When one thing is flawed, I look at how the items join. I present the framework beneath the issue.
Below strain, that intuition intensified.
The extra anxious I felt, the extra thorough my explanations turned. My emails weren’t emotional—they have been intricate. Complete. Dense.
And exhausting.
What I slowly started to see was that my want for completeness wasn’t simply mental self-discipline.
It was nervousness in disguise.
If I lined each angle, I wouldn’t be susceptible. However masking each angle didn’t calm me. It stored me spinning.
The Energy of the Pause
The shift didn’t occur dramatically.
It started with interruption.
Earlier than sending sure emails, I began creating area. Typically that meant stepping away for a day. Typically it meant reviewing my draft by a impartial lens and asking easy questions:
Is that this clear? Is that this too dense? What consequence am I truly in search of?
What shocked me wasn’t the suggestions.
It was the pause itself.
As an alternative of including extra clarification, I started eradicating it.
Half of what I had written was defensible—however pointless. I didn’t have to anticipate each counterargument. I didn’t have to show the whole philosophical basis of equity.
I wanted to be exact.
And precision felt calmer.
Readability Is Stronger Than Quantity
Energy, I started to see, doesn’t come from density.
It comes from readability.
Not each supporting concept belongs within the e mail.
Not each potential objection must be pre-argued.
Not each element must be defended.
Typically readability means chopping your argument in half.
That felt uncomfortable at first. It felt like give up.
But it surely wasn’t give up.
It was refinement.
Once I shortened my responses, one thing else shortened too—my rumination. My physique softened. The interior courtroom grew quieter.
Readability diminished the emotional cost.
Learn how to Advocate With out Escalating
If you end up over-explaining in moments of battle, right here’s what helped me:
First, write the complete model privately. Say every thing. Construct the whole fortress if you have to.
Then step away.
Once you return, ask your self:
- What particular consequence do I need?
- Which sentences immediately help that consequence?
- Which sentences try to show I’m proper?
Lower what’s making an attempt to show. Hold what’s making an attempt to resolve.
Substitute summary claims with clear requests. As an alternative of “That is unfair,” attempt “I’m requesting X by Y date.”
Discover how your physique feels once you learn the shorter model.
Typically, it feels steadier.
And steadiness is energy.
Selecting Dignity Over Concern
Finally, the conflicts have been resolved. Not dramatically. Not completely. However sufficiently.
What stayed with me wasn’t the end result.
It was who I had grow to be.
Much less reactive. Much less tangled in overconstruction. Much less afraid that readability required whole protection.
I had discovered one thing I had by no means been taught:
Advocacy doesn’t require agitation.
It requires presence.
You wouldn’t have to overwhelm somebody to face your floor.
You wouldn’t have to sacrifice your peace to defend your rights.
Concern tries to cowl each angle. Dignity stands inside one clear place.
Once I shifted from constructing mental fortresses to standing calmly inside what I wanted, every thing modified—not essentially the system, however me.
And that was sufficient.
If you’re dealing with one thing comparable proper now—an e mail you dread sending, a state of affairs the place you’re feeling unheard—attempt creating area earlier than you reply.
Draft it. Don’t ship it. Return with calmer eyes.
Select readability over protection. Select steadiness over urgency.
You may advocate for your self with out shedding your peace.
I didn’t got down to be taught that lesson.
However I’m grateful I did.
If sharing this helps even one particular person really feel much less alone in that uneasy area between self-defense and self-preservation, then the stress I went by was not wasted. That’s my hope.
About Tony Collins
Edward “Tony” Collins, EdD, MFA, is a documentary filmmaker, author, educator, and incapacity advocate dwelling with progressive imaginative and prescient loss from macular degeneration. His work explores presence, caregiving, resilience, and the quiet energy of small moments. He’s at the moment finishing books on artistic scholarship and collaborative documentary filmmaking and shares private essays about which means, hope, and incapacity on Substack.
Join: substack.com/@iefilm | iefilm.com